Skip to main content

ABOUT SAFE CHILD ACT 2012 like the act click here


ABOUT SAFE CHILD ACT 2012 http://www.causes.com/causes/659087-safe-child-act-2012/about

safe child act 2012 
The heart of the proposal is the requirement that professionals used to provide expertise and advice to the court are knowledgeable about the five subjects required for an understanding of domestic violence. These are:
1. Knowing what behaviors are associated with higher risk of lethality or injury.
2. Domestic violence dynamics
3. The effects of domestic violence on children.
4. Recognizing domestic violence
5. Batterer narratives.
With these provisions the courts can stop sending children to live with dangerous abusers. Instead of pressuring mothers to cooperate with their abusers they can be using their power and authority to require him to stop his abuse if he wants to have a relationship with the children. It is important for legislators and court professionals to understand that children do not need both parents equally. They need the safe parent more than the abusive one and their primary attachment figure more than their other parent. It is certainly high time the courts start making decisions that are truly based on what is really in the best interests of the children. 
by Barry Goldstein  http://www.causes.com/causes/659087-safe-child-act-2012/about

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Help us protect children and families and make our communities safer to live in

Help us protect children and families and make our communities safer to live in Sign here  https://www.change.org/p/family-courts-across-the-united-states-are-placing-children-in-abusers-homes-is-wisconsin-afcc-responsible-for-this-national-global-problem-see-the-investigation-here-and-if-you-think-so-please-sign-here I care about the safety of children, Family's, and communities across the United States. The current out dated policy's in place in family courts are bankrupting family's placing children in abusers homes and making our communities dangerous to live in. It is time to address the family court crisis and stop ignoring parents pleas for help and retaliating against them for standing up for the protection of children and instead stand with them and against the family court corporation harming children and families. I hereby request the immediate removal of judges from the afcc and the aaml which could be in violation of cannon laws(if it is not legisla...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children Please help us protect children of Wisconsin with an Investigation/Removal of this Wisconsin DHS contracted PhD.  This PhD is gateway legalizing child abuse with custody evaluations based on the discredited parental alienation. No child is safe in Wisconsin with this PhD involved in Child custody studies.  Children have been placed in harms way because of the reports this expert is writing in criminal child abuse cases/custody studies and protected by the department of Health and Human services. Please see all supporting evidence below and help us protect future children from being placed in abusers homes.   We can save lives by removing this Department of Health and human services PhD  and investigating to ensure this never happens again.   please sign here and hep us protect children  https://www.change.org/p/wisconsin-department-of-safety-and-professional-services-...
Post a Comment
Read more

Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and Its Admissibility in the Family Court. Journal of Child Custody, 1(2), 47-74. [download from Haworth

Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and Its Admissibility in the Family Court. Journal of Child Custod y, 1(2), 47-74. [ download from Haworth $ ] ABSTRACT: Over the past three decades, a syndrome, titled Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), has been proposed to explain behaviors by a child who refuses to spend time with a parent and actually denigrates that parent within the context of a child custody dispute. The association of certain negative behaviors by one parent (called the 'alienator') towards the other parent (called the 'target parent') are said to be the cause of the child's (called 'alienated child') behavior. Although some mental health professionals and child custody evaluators, attorneys, and judges have been quick to accept and admit PAS as evidence in these disputes, especially in those that have cross-complaints alleging family violence, there has been no consiste...
Post a Comment
Read more