Skip to main content

Jennifer Hoult. (Spring 2006)he Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy, Children's Legal Rights Journal, 26(1) pp. 1-61

Jennifer Hoult. (Spring 2006). The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy, Children's Legal Rights Journal, 26(1) pp. 1-61.
Abstract: Since 1985, in jurisdictions all over the United States, fathers have been awarded sole custody of their children based on claims that mothers alienated these children due to a pathological medical syndrome called Parental Alienation Syndrome ("PAS").  Given that some such cases have involved stark outcomes, including murder and suicide, PAS' admissibility in U.S. courts deserves scrutiny.
This article presents the first comprehensive analysis of the science, law, and policy issues involved in PAS' evidentiary admissibility.  As a novel scientific theory, PAS' admissibility is governed by a variety of evidentiary gatekeeping standards that seek to protect legal fora from the influence of pseudo-science.  This article analyzes every precedent-bearing decision and law review article referencing PAS in the past twenty years, finding that precedent holds PAS inadmissible and the majority of legal scholarship views it negatively.  The article further analyzes PAS' admissibility under the standards defined in Frye v. United States, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael, and Rules 702 and 704(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, including analysis of PAS' scientific validity and reliability; concluding that PAS remains an ipse dixit and inadmissible under these standards. 
The article also analyzes the writings of PAS' originator, child psychiatrist Richard Gardner - including twenty-three peer-reviewed articles and fifty legal decisions he cited in support of his claim that PAS is scientifically valid and legally admissible - finding that these materials support neither PAS' existence, nor its legal admissibility.  Finally, the article examines the policy issues raised by PAS' admissibility through an analysis of PAS' roots in Gardner 's theory of human sexuality, a theory that views adult-child sexual contact as benign and beneficial to the reproduction of the species.
The article concludes that science, law, and policy all support PAS inadmissability.
(Note: The Children's Legal Rights Journal is published by the American Bar Association, Center on Children and the Law, and Loyola University Chicago School of Law)
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/faq.htm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Help us protect children and families and make our communities safer to live in

Help us protect children and families and make our communities safer to live in Sign here  https://www.change.org/p/family-courts-across-the-united-states-are-placing-children-in-abusers-homes-is-wisconsin-afcc-responsible-for-this-national-global-problem-see-the-investigation-here-and-if-you-think-so-please-sign-here I care about the safety of children, Family's, and communities across the United States. The current out dated policy's in place in family courts are bankrupting family's placing children in abusers homes and making our communities dangerous to live in. It is time to address the family court crisis and stop ignoring parents pleas for help and retaliating against them for standing up for the protection of children and instead stand with them and against the family court corporation harming children and families. I hereby request the immediate removal of judges from the afcc and the aaml which could be in violation of cannon laws(if it is not legisla...
Post a Comment
Read more

Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and Its Admissibility in the Family Court. Journal of Child Custody, 1(2), 47-74. [download from Haworth

Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and Its Admissibility in the Family Court. Journal of Child Custod y, 1(2), 47-74. [ download from Haworth $ ] ABSTRACT: Over the past three decades, a syndrome, titled Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), has been proposed to explain behaviors by a child who refuses to spend time with a parent and actually denigrates that parent within the context of a child custody dispute. The association of certain negative behaviors by one parent (called the 'alienator') towards the other parent (called the 'target parent') are said to be the cause of the child's (called 'alienated child') behavior. Although some mental health professionals and child custody evaluators, attorneys, and judges have been quick to accept and admit PAS as evidence in these disputes, especially in those that have cross-complaints alleging family violence, there has been no consiste...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children Please help us protect children of Wisconsin with an Investigation/Removal of this Wisconsin DHS contracted PhD.  This PhD is gateway legalizing child abuse with custody evaluations based on the discredited parental alienation. No child is safe in Wisconsin with this PhD involved in Child custody studies.  Children have been placed in harms way because of the reports this expert is writing in criminal child abuse cases/custody studies and protected by the department of Health and Human services. Please see all supporting evidence below and help us protect future children from being placed in abusers homes.   We can save lives by removing this Department of Health and human services PhD  and investigating to ensure this never happens again.   please sign here and hep us protect children  https://www.change.org/p/wisconsin-department-of-safety-and-professional-services-...
Post a Comment
Read more