Skip to main content

Jennifer Hoult. (Spring 2006)he Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy, Children's Legal Rights Journal, 26(1) pp. 1-61

Jennifer Hoult. (Spring 2006). The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy, Children's Legal Rights Journal, 26(1) pp. 1-61.
Abstract: Since 1985, in jurisdictions all over the United States, fathers have been awarded sole custody of their children based on claims that mothers alienated these children due to a pathological medical syndrome called Parental Alienation Syndrome ("PAS").  Given that some such cases have involved stark outcomes, including murder and suicide, PAS' admissibility in U.S. courts deserves scrutiny.
This article presents the first comprehensive analysis of the science, law, and policy issues involved in PAS' evidentiary admissibility.  As a novel scientific theory, PAS' admissibility is governed by a variety of evidentiary gatekeeping standards that seek to protect legal fora from the influence of pseudo-science.  This article analyzes every precedent-bearing decision and law review article referencing PAS in the past twenty years, finding that precedent holds PAS inadmissible and the majority of legal scholarship views it negatively.  The article further analyzes PAS' admissibility under the standards defined in Frye v. United States, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael, and Rules 702 and 704(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, including analysis of PAS' scientific validity and reliability; concluding that PAS remains an ipse dixit and inadmissible under these standards. 
The article also analyzes the writings of PAS' originator, child psychiatrist Richard Gardner - including twenty-three peer-reviewed articles and fifty legal decisions he cited in support of his claim that PAS is scientifically valid and legally admissible - finding that these materials support neither PAS' existence, nor its legal admissibility.  Finally, the article examines the policy issues raised by PAS' admissibility through an analysis of PAS' roots in Gardner 's theory of human sexuality, a theory that views adult-child sexual contact as benign and beneficial to the reproduction of the species.
The article concludes that science, law, and policy all support PAS inadmissability.
(Note: The Children's Legal Rights Journal is published by the American Bar Association, Center on Children and the Law, and Loyola University Chicago School of Law)
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/faq.htm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The effects of pas theory tragic sign petition here see legal and protect children from the harm this tragic theory causes when allowed

The report that started this advocates journey to eradicate pas theory  01 Nelson 02 Michael Jan 03 Ph.D. 04 Psychologist 05 420 ... www.the lizlibrary .org/therapeutic-jurisprudence/ nelson .txt   01  Nelson  02  Michael  Jan 03 Ph.D. 04 Psychologist 05 420 1st Avenue South ...  case transmogrified with therapization into a semi- parental alienation  case, with   ... I have spent over 4 years fighting this discredited theory from Wisconsin rapids to the top of Wisconsin I wrote, emailed,filed complaints, sent the legal,  shared the legal, yet no one helped.  No one followed the legal and most lawyers told me they did not have to follow the legal told me they were all in on it and there was nothing i could do about it. And so began my very large investigation into the State i live in and then to the surrounding States and beyond. I saw hundreds of these sad cases all of parents losing custody to abusers and i...
Post a Comment
Read more

2015 the year we end the harmful effects of the discredited parental alienation theory

My goal in 2015 is to eradicate the discredited parental alienation theory placing children in abusers homes  Help us protect children and eradicate this disturbing theory In 2015 there is absolutely no excuse for the discredited parental alienation theory to be used We know the harm, we know lives were lost, and we know children were placed in the abusers homes  We can see the plethora of legal against the use, the harm, the fact that it is malpractice and the overall destruction caused to children and families  There is no excuse for individuals whether PhD. or lawyer who choose to ignore the legal and continue to use this disturbing pro-sex with children theory  Lets make 2015 the year this discredited theory being used to gate way legalize child sexual abuse is barred from the courts and the plethora of legal against it used to protect the children who suffered the most from the acceptance of this discredited theory  There is no excuse for abuse and there is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children Please help us protect children of Wisconsin with an Investigation/Removal of this Wisconsin DHS contracted PhD.  This PhD is gateway legalizing child abuse with custody evaluations based on the discredited parental alienation. No child is safe in Wisconsin with this PhD involved in Child custody studies.  Children have been placed in harms way because of the reports this expert is writing in criminal child abuse cases/custody studies and protected by the department of Health and Human services. Please see all supporting evidence below and help us protect future children from being placed in abusers homes.   We can save lives by removing this Department of Health and human services PhD  and investigating to ensure this never happens again.   please sign here and hep us protect children  https://www.change.org/p/wisconsin-department-of-safety-and-professional-services-...
Post a Comment
Read more