Skip to main content

Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O'Donohue, W. T. (2007). Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1-29.

Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O'Donohue, W. T. (2007). Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1-29.
Theoretically, the law guides and controls child custody evaluations, but the prevailing custody standard (the ''best interests of the child'' test) is a vague rule that directs judges to make decisions unique to individual cases according to what will be in children's future (and undefined) best interests. Furthermore, state statutes typically offer only vague guidelines as to how judges (and evaluators) are to assess parents and the merits of their cases, and how they should ultimately decide what custody arrangements will be in a child's best interests. In this vacuum, custody evaluators typically administer to parents and children an array of tests and assess them through less formal means including interviews and observation. Sadly, we find that (a) tests specifically developed to assess questions relevant to custody are completely inadequate on scientific grounds; (b) the claims of some anointed experts about their favorite constructs (e.g., ''parent alienation syndrome'') are equally hollow when subjected to scientific scrutiny; (c) evaluators should question the use even of well-established psychological measures (e.g., measures of intelligence, personality, psychopathology, and academic achievement) because of their often limited relevance to the questions before the court; and (d) little empirical data exist regarding other important and controversial issues (e.g., whether evaluators should solicit children's wishes about custody; whether infants and toddlers are harmed or helped by overnight visits), suggesting a need for further scientific investigation.
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/dv.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Help us protect children and families and make our communities safer to live in

Help us protect children and families and make our communities safer to live in Sign here  https://www.change.org/p/family-courts-across-the-united-states-are-placing-children-in-abusers-homes-is-wisconsin-afcc-responsible-for-this-national-global-problem-see-the-investigation-here-and-if-you-think-so-please-sign-here I care about the safety of children, Family's, and communities across the United States. The current out dated policy's in place in family courts are bankrupting family's placing children in abusers homes and making our communities dangerous to live in. It is time to address the family court crisis and stop ignoring parents pleas for help and retaliating against them for standing up for the protection of children and instead stand with them and against the family court corporation harming children and families. I hereby request the immediate removal of judges from the afcc and the aaml which could be in violation of cannon laws(if it is not legisla...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children

Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children Please help us protect children of Wisconsin with an Investigation/Removal of this Wisconsin DHS contracted PhD.  This PhD is gateway legalizing child abuse with custody evaluations based on the discredited parental alienation. No child is safe in Wisconsin with this PhD involved in Child custody studies.  Children have been placed in harms way because of the reports this expert is writing in criminal child abuse cases/custody studies and protected by the department of Health and Human services. Please see all supporting evidence below and help us protect future children from being placed in abusers homes.   We can save lives by removing this Department of Health and human services PhD  and investigating to ensure this never happens again.   please sign here and hep us protect children  https://www.change.org/p/wisconsin-department-of-safety-and-professional-services-...
Post a Comment
Read more

Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and Its Admissibility in the Family Court. Journal of Child Custody, 1(2), 47-74. [download from Haworth

Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and Its Admissibility in the Family Court. Journal of Child Custod y, 1(2), 47-74. [ download from Haworth $ ] ABSTRACT: Over the past three decades, a syndrome, titled Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), has been proposed to explain behaviors by a child who refuses to spend time with a parent and actually denigrates that parent within the context of a child custody dispute. The association of certain negative behaviors by one parent (called the 'alienator') towards the other parent (called the 'target parent') are said to be the cause of the child's (called 'alienated child') behavior. Although some mental health professionals and child custody evaluators, attorneys, and judges have been quick to accept and admit PAS as evidence in these disputes, especially in those that have cross-complaints alleging family violence, there has been no consiste...
Post a Comment
Read more